@domenic, @rsolomakhin, all, please note that this is incomplete, just seeking feedback on approach at this point (you will spot a "To Be Written" algo). I need to read E.164 spec in details, so to understand a bit more about phone number formats and structure. In any case, let me know what you think! Renaming `PaymentAddress` might be "nice" too... but maybe too late, unless we go down the `NamedConstructor` route 🙀, which I don't think we want.. or we can just live with the crappy name. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/654#issuecomment-345634816
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 09:14:03 UTC