- From: adamroach <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:28:59 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api <webpayments-payment-apps-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/95@github.com>
When a payment app is being set up in the current spec, it does so by (a) registering as a service worker, and then (b) installing a monolithic object via `PaymentAppManager.setManifest()`. Subsequent updates are performed through calling `PaymentAppManager.getManifest()`, mutating the object, and setting it again. @marcoscaceres has proposed that this be replaced with a decomposed interface that allows for payment apps to modify their characteristics on a more granular level using get/set/delete/etc. operations. As a slight modification of the proposal he made in his payment-request-handler document, I propose concretely: 1. Removing the `setManifest()` and `setManifest()` methods from `PaymentAppManager`. 2. Adding new `setName()` and `setIcon()` methods to `PaymentAppManager`. 3. Adding a new `options` attribute to `PaymentAppManager`, of type `PaymentMethodOption`, having the following definition (taken from Marcos' proposal): ```webidl [Exposed=(Window,Worker)] interface PaymentMethodOptions { [NewObject] Promise<boolean> delete(DOMString methodKey); [NewObject] Promise<PaymentMethodDetails> get(DOMString methodKey); [NewObject] Promise<sequence<DOMString>> keys(); [NewObject] Promise<boolean> has(DOMString methodKey); [NewObject] Promise<void> set(DOMString methodKey, PaymentMethodDetails details); }; ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/issues/95
Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 22:29:32 UTC