Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Flows issue 32 (#131)

@mattsaxon, my point is that this PR contains all the changes that are also in PR #144.
i.e. If the editors merge this change then they can close PR #144.

I'm happy to merge the change and update from WebIDL to another schema/IDL later was just checking if this PR contained commits that were unintended.

+1 to merge and also close #114.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/131#issuecomment-212947762

Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 14:36:32 UTC