Re: FW: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of Commerce IG Charter - Please Respond by 19 June

There was quite a comprehensive list of other standards put together early
in the W3C Web Payments work, and probably most of it is relevant here.

For a "Commerce IG" it seems to me that ISO 20022 for financial messaging
is adjacent, not directly involved. If the the charter should mention just
an example or two, ISO 19845 is more directly in the commerce sphere. (I'm
not playing 'favourites' -- in own work those two are equally important.)

Joseph Potvin
Executive Director, Xalgorithms Foundation
Mobile: 819-593-5983
jpotvin@xalgorithms.org
https://www.xalgorithms.org



On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:01 AM, David Ezell <David_E3@verifone.com> wrote:

> I would caution that since the line say’s “e.g.” it’s very open to all the
> standards mentioned below, as well as others that may be as important, but
> we don’t have them on the list.  The more standards mentioned in the list,
> the more precise it seems, and that’s not accurate.
>
>
>
> *From:* KETELS Kris [mailto:Kris.KETELS@swift.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:11 AM
> *To:* Joseph Potvin; Jean-Yves Rossi
> *Cc:* Katie Haritos-Shea; Kenneth Mealey; David Ezell; Web Payments IG;
> Dapeng Liu (Max) (max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com); Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)
> *Subject:* RE: FW: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of
> Commerce IG Charter - Please Respond by 19 June
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> There are quite a few financial (and other)  standards around. Will you be
> the liaison for the standards you mention?
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Kris
>
>
>
> *From:* Joseph Potvin [mailto:jpotvin@opman.ca <jpotvin@opman.ca>]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 19, 2017 11:06 AM
> *To:* Jean-Yves Rossi
> *Cc:* Katie Haritos-Shea; Kenneth Mealey; David Ezell; Web Payments IG;
> Dapeng Liu (Max) (max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com); Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)
> *Subject:* Re: FW: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of
> Commerce IG Charter - Please Respond by 19 June
>
>
>
> RE: Harmonization with other standards (e.g., ISO 20022)
>
>
>
> I suggest:
>
>
> Harmonization with other standards (e.g., ISO 19845, ISO 20022, UNICITRAL
> WG IV)
>
>
> Joseph Potvin
> Executive Director, Xalgorithms Foundation
> Mobile: 819-593-5983
> jpotvin@xalgorithms.org
> https://www.xalgorithms.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 10:08 AM
> To: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
> Subject: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of Commerce IG
> Charter - Please Respond by 19 June
>
> Dear Web Payments Interest Group Participants,
>
> The charter of the Web Payments Interest Group [1] expires 30 September
> 2017.
> Since the March face-to-face meeting [2], we have been developing a new
> charter with an expanded scope.
>
> This is a Call for Consensus to determine whether the Interest Group
> supports the W3C Director requesting Membership review [3] of:
>
>    Commerce Interest Group Charter
>    https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html
>
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 9am ET on 19 June.
>
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/04/payments/webpayments_charter.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/22-wpay-minutes#item08
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#CharterReview
>
> =========
> PROPOSAL: That the Web Payments Interest Group request that the W3C
> Director
>                       propose the above charter to the W3C Membership.
>
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>
> 1. Support the proposal.
>
> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>    if suggested changes are not taken into account.
>
> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>    unless the changes are taken into account.
>
> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>
> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Interest Group.
>
> 6. Abstain.
>
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>
> If there is strong consensus by 19 June (9am ET) for the proposal, it will
> carry.
>
> If there are objections or proposals for substantive changes we will try
> to resolve them and start a new Call for Consensus.
>
> ====================
> Regarding Formal Objections
>
> * If you do not support the charter and you wish your lack of support  to
> be communicated to the W3C Director and reviewed, please include  the
> phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION” [4] in your response. Be sure to  include
> substantive arguments or rationale.
>
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [4].
>
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>  individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that  would
> address the concern and increase consensus to advance the  charter.
>
> [4] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
>
> ============================
> Next steps if the Proposal carries
>
> If the proposal carries, the W3C Management Team will review and complete
> the draft charter (e.g., by adding information about chairs and team
> contacts and charter end date).
>
> If the W3C Management Team approves the charter, they will initiate a
> 4-week review by the W3C Membership.
>
> Our goal is to launch the Commerce IG by mid-September and to hold a
> Face-to-Face meeting during TPAC 2017. (This would take the place of the
> Web Payments IG Face-to-Face meeting.)
>
> For more about chartering operations, see:
>  https://www.w3.org/Guide/Charter.html
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> American Express made the following annotations
> ************************************************************
> ******************
> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient
> and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the
> information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply
> e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any
> attachments. Thank you."
>
> American Express a ajouté le commentaire suivant le Ce courrier et toute
> pièce jointe qu'il contient sont réservés au seul destinataire indiqué et
> peuvent renfermer des
> renseignements confidentiels et privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le
> destinataire prévu, toute divulgation, duplication, utilisation ou
> distribution du courrier ou de toute pièce jointe est interdite. Si vous
> avez reçu cette communication par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser par
> courrier et détruire immédiatement le courrier et les pièces jointes. Merci.
>
> ************************************************************
> ******************
>
>
>
>
> *********************************************************
> This electronic message and any attachments are intended only for the use
> of the addressee. The information in this electronic message is
> confidential and proprietary, and may include privileged information. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete this electronic message
> and any attachments and notify the sender of the error. Please be aware
> that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> message or any attachments is strictly prohibited.
>