Re: FW: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of Commerce IG Charter - Please Respond by 19 June

RE: Harmonization with other standards (e.g., ISO 20022)

I suggest:

Harmonization with other standards (e.g., ISO 19845, ISO 20022, UNICITRAL
WG IV)

Joseph Potvin
Executive Director, Xalgorithms Foundation
Mobile: 819-593-5983
jpotvin@xalgorithms.org
https://www.xalgorithms.org



>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
>>> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 10:08 AM
>>> To: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Call for Consensus to Request Member Review of Commerce IG
>>> Charter - Please Respond by 19 June
>>>
>>> Dear Web Payments Interest Group Participants,
>>>
>>> The charter of the Web Payments Interest Group [1] expires 30 September
>>> 2017.
>>> Since the March face-to-face meeting [2], we have been developing a new
>>> charter with an expanded scope.
>>>
>>> This is a Call for Consensus to determine whether the Interest Group
>>> supports the W3C Director requesting Membership review [3] of:
>>>
>>>    Commerce Interest Group Charter
>>>    https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html
>>>
>>> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 9am ET on 19 June.
>>>
>>> For the co-Chairs,
>>> Ian Jacobs
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/04/payments/webpayments_charter.html
>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/22-wpay-minutes#item08
>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#CharterReview
>>>
>>> =========
>>> PROPOSAL: That the Web Payments Interest Group request that the W3C
>>> Director
>>>                       propose the above charter to the W3C Membership.
>>>
>>> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>>>
>>> 1. Support the proposal.
>>>
>>> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>>>    if suggested changes are not taken into account.
>>>
>>> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>>>    unless the changes are taken into account.
>>>
>>> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>>>
>>> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Interest Group.
>>>
>>> 6. Abstain.
>>>
>>> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>>>
>>> If there is strong consensus by 19 June (9am ET) for the proposal, it
>>> will carry.
>>>
>>> If there are objections or proposals for substantive changes we will try
>>> to resolve them and start a new Call for Consensus.
>>>
>>> ====================
>>> Regarding Formal Objections
>>>
>>> * If you do not support the charter and you wish your lack of support
>>> to be communicated to the W3C Director and reviewed, please include  the
>>> phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION” [4] in your response. Be sure to  include
>>> substantive arguments or rationale.
>>>
>>> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [4].
>>>
>>> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>>>  individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that
>>> would address the concern and increase consensus to advance the  charter.
>>>
>>> [4] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
>>>
>>> ============================
>>> Next steps if the Proposal carries
>>>
>>> If the proposal carries, the W3C Management Team will review and
>>> complete the draft charter (e.g., by adding information about chairs and
>>> team contacts and charter end date).
>>>
>>> If the W3C Management Team approves the charter, they will initiate a
>>> 4-week review by the W3C Membership.
>>>
>>> Our goal is to launch the Commerce IG by mid-September and to hold a
>>> Face-to-Face meeting during TPAC 2017. (This would take the place of the
>>> Web Payments IG Face-to-Face meeting.)
>>>
>>> For more about chartering operations, see:
>>>  https://www.w3.org/Guide/Charter.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>>> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> American Express made the following annotations
>>> ************************************************************
>>> ******************
>>> "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient
>>> and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
>>> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the
>>> information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If
>>> you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply
>>> e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any
>>> attachments. Thank you."
>>>
>>> American Express a ajouté le commentaire suivant le Ce courrier et toute
>>> pièce jointe qu'il contient sont réservés au seul destinataire indiqué et
>>> peuvent renfermer des
>>> renseignements confidentiels et privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le
>>> destinataire prévu, toute divulgation, duplication, utilisation ou
>>> distribution du courrier ou de toute pièce jointe est interdite. Si vous
>>> avez reçu cette communication par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser par
>>> courrier et détruire immédiatement le courrier et les pièces jointes. Merci.
>>>
>>> ************************************************************
>>> ******************
>>>
>>
>