Re: Agenda: Verifiable Claims Teleconference - Tuesday, January 17, 2017

On Tue., 17 Jan. 2017, 9:51 pm Daniel Burnett, <danielcburnett@gmail.com <mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:
On 01/14/2017 03:51 PM, Daniel Burnett wrote:
> 2. Use Case review -- issue discussion [1] (Joe, 50 mins)

There has been a significant amount of response to Christopher Allen's
WoT use cases that would be useful to discuss:

https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/32 <https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/32>

Since there has been almost no discussion of the use case document issues (with the exception of https://github.com/opencreds/vc-use-cases/issues/30 <https://github.com/opencreds/vc-use-cases/issues/30>, which is still in progress), I would be happy to propose we discuss the WoT issue first. 


We may also want to spend some time re-prioritizing the Privacy section
of the document in an attempt to address W3C Member concerns wrt. privacy.

This seems a bit open-ended.  Do you have a specific proposal you can send as an issue or PR?

Let's try to ensure its targeted at providing support for human dignity (therein, inc. privacy).

Other dignity related functions may include that a person disagrees with a "verifiable claim" made about them.

Therein, issues that likely require ontology as a counterpart of a broader solution is bigger than simply privacy (whether that be of the subject, issuer, et.al.).

Tim.h.
 

-- manu

--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ <http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/>