- From: Joe Andrieu <joe@joeandrieu.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:43:42 -0800
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, "Varn, Richard J" <rvarn@ets.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "=Drummond Reed" <drummond@respect.network>, Les Chasen <les@respect.network>, Bob Burke <bburke@kou.pn>, Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1483771422.2127634.840076769.08ABA8EE@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote: > Tim, > > The use cases we'll be discussing are at > https://opencreds.github.io/vc-use-cases/ > > Please suggest improvements or ask questions via the issues list at > https://github.com/opencreds/vc-use-cases/issues > > I'll have some proposals for additions/improvements to the Needs Map > and there are already twenty issues to consider, ranging from simple > grammar to terminology shifts and additional content. > > The more we can discuss via github issues, the easier it will be to > address your concerns about time on the call. > > -j > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 02:32 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote: >> Maybe also basic math skills tutorial? >> The allotted time (perusal) is 1 hour, and someone is leading the >> schedule into a format that seems to imply use of some unknown >> compression format. >> We use standards here I thought? Time being one of them. >> Best wishes for 2017. I suggest if the agenda items do not fit into >> the allotted time (ie 1 hour schedule with specified tasks and >> allotted time) its disingenuous to list it. (To a running sheet that >> says you need 1:50). >> Unless some sort of other statement is implied, that is less clear? >> If people believe they'll be running the broader agenda, with an >> array of "lockout modalities", I expect a graph / ontological >> response is amongst the most likely outcomes. (If, like the >> compression algorithm used in your proposed agenda that does not make >> sense, let me know. Happy to outline it.). >> Finally, please supply the modern usecases being reviewed. They've >> been stripped in past, simplified, and I believe the dignity/privacy >> related considerations less than clear as part of former text >> redactions. It's important people know what their voting for. >> Tim.h. >> >> On Sat., 7 Jan. 2017, 8:21 am Varn, Richard J, <rvarn@ets.org> wrote: >>> Tuesday, January 10, 2017____ >>> Time: 11am ET, UTC -5____ >>> Text Chat: http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf____ >>> irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf____ >>> Voice: sip:vctf@96.89.14.196[1]____ >>> tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306 (extension 6306)____ >>> Duration: 60 minutes____ >>> Scribes: DanB, NateO, KerriL, MatthewL, CarlaC, StuartS, MattS, >>> GreggK, ShaneM, Longley, ChristopherA, Manu, DavidE, LesC, RichardV, >>> BrianS,____ >>> __ __ >>> Proposed Agenda____ >>> ---------------____ >>> 0. Agenda review and Introductions (5 mins)____ >>> 1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG is open - Vote! (5 mins)____ >>> 2. Use Case Review (50 mins)____ >>> ----The Line---- (if time permits after the above)____ >>> 3. Use of WebIDL in spec [1] (20 min target)____ >>> 4. Privacy Section Discussion [2] (10 min intro)____ >>> 5. Part II of the GitHub tutorial (20 mins)____ >>> __ __ >>> [1]https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/4____ >>> [2] https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues____ >>> __ __ >>> Please let us know if there are any other items to consider at the >>> next meeting or subsequent meetings.____ >>> __ __ >>> __ __ >>> __ __ >>> __ __ >>> >>> >>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged >>> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual >>> for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you >>> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not >>> disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the >>> contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any >>> other use of this e-mail is prohibited. >>> >>> Thank you for your compliance. >>> > > -- > Joe Andrieu, PMP > joe@andrieu.net > +1(805)705-8651 > http://blog.joeandrieu.com > -- Joe Andrieu, PMP joe@joeandrieu.com +1(805)705-8651 http://blog.joeandrieu.com Links: 1. mailto:sip%3Avctf@96.89.14.196
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2017 06:44:22 UTC