W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments-ig@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Agenda for January 10 VCTF meeting

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:55:22 -0600
Message-Id: <CAM1Sok23hLnGCUS4fGQJ5VvTdFeFNw9=t0siFKUsjSFG8qXR8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Varn, Richard J" <rvarn@ets.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Maybe also basic math skills tutorial?

The allotted time (perusal) is 1 hour, and someone is leading the schedule into a format that seems to imply use of some unknown compression format.

We use standards here I thought?  Time being one of them.

Best wishes for 2017.  I suggest if the agenda items do not fit into the allotted time (ie 1 hour schedule with specified tasks and allotted time) its disingenuous to list it. (To a running sheet that says you need 1:50).

Unless some sort of other statement is implied, that is less clear?

If people believe they'll be running the broader agenda, with an array of "lockout modalities", I expect a graph / ontological response is amongst the most likely  outcomes. (If, like the compression algorithm used in your proposed agenda that does not make sense, let me know.  Happy to outline it.).

Finally, please supply the modern usecases being reviewed.  They've been stripped in past, simplified, and I believe the dignity/privacy related considerations less than clear as part of former text redactions. It's important people know what their voting for.


On Sat., 7 Jan. 2017, 8:21 am Varn, Richard J, <rvarn@ets.org <mailto:rvarn@ets.org>> wrote:
Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Time: 11am ET, UTC -5

Text Chat: http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf <http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf>
           irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf <http://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf>
Voice: sip:vctf@ <mailto:sip%3Avctf@>
       tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306 <tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306> (extension 6306)

Duration: 60 minutes

Scribes: DanB, NateO, KerriL, MatthewL, CarlaC, StuartS, MattS, GreggK, ShaneM, Longley, ChristopherA, Manu, DavidE, LesC, RichardV, BrianS,

Proposed Agenda


0. Agenda review and Introductions (5 mins)

1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG is open - Vote! (5 mins)

2. Use Case Review (50 mins)

----The Line---- (if time permits after the above)

3. Use of WebIDL in spec [1] (20 min target)

4. Privacy Section Discussion [2] (10 min intro)

5. Part II of the GitHub tutorial (20 mins)

[1]https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/4 <https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/4>
[2] https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues <https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues>

Please let us know if there are any other items to consider at the next meeting or subsequent meetings.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.

Received on Saturday, 7 January 2017 03:55:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:56 UTC