- From: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:01:17 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+EnjbKfRA-J5-TWpw4=jDnTHqYYnQArxFCMCs2BBnT=_LQszg@mail.gmail.com>
Congratulations, all, and special thanks to Manu for excellent leadership and unflagging efforts to garner consensus! -- dan On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The Web Payments Interest Group met last week at MIT in Boston to > determine if they wanted to proceed with the Verifiable Claims work. > While the minutes of those meetings won't be made public for the next > week or two, W3C Staff noted that we can share the general outcome of > the decision. > > The decision was almost unanimous to progress the Verifiable Claims > proposal to W3C Management. Hooray! Congratulations to everyone involved > as this is a major step forward. > > There were, however, three dissenting positions that we should take very > seriously and discuss in depth over the next few weeks. The telecon for > this week is canceled because many of us are at the Web Payments Working > Group face-to-face meeting in London this week. So, the rest of this > email will attempt to outline general next steps and specific work items > for the group. > > The anticipated next steps at W3C are: > > 1. A modified charter is negotiated with W3C Management and the > dissenting organizations. > 2. Once we have consensus among all organizations involved, the > expectation is that the modified charter and proposal will be put > forward to W3C membership for a vote. The timeline for this is > unknown at this point. > 3. We will most likely attempt to have a Verifiable Claims > face-to-face meeting at W3C TPAC 2016, but have not sorted out > those details yet: https://www.w3.org/2016/09/TPAC/ > > We know of the following modification requests to the charter: > > 1. Constrain the charter to Education only. > 2. Demonstrate that the charter is not competitive to JSON Object > Signing and Encryption Web Tokens (JOSE JWT). > 3. Remove or greatly narrow the overarching problem statement > about self-sovereign ecosystem and goals from the charter. > > The anticipated next steps for the Verifiable Claims Task Force and > Credentials Community Group are: > > 1. Determine if we want to constrain the charter to Education only. > 2. Update the Data Model and Representations specification to clearly > demonstrate that this technology is not competitive to JOSE/JWT. > 3. Determine if we want to modify the problem statement and > charter goals. > 4. Plan our first face-to-face meeting, possibly at W3C TPAC in > Lisbon at the end of September. > > W3C Staff are currently drafting changes that they think would result in > consensus. Once we have those suggestions in hand, and once we've talked > with the dissenting organizations, we'll be able to have a better idea > about timeline. > > The next Verifiable Claims telecon will be Tuesday, July 12th at 11am > ET. Dial in details can be found here: > > https://w3c.github.io/vctf/#telecons > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Web Browser API Incubation Anti-Pattern > http://manu.sporny.org/2016/browser-api-incubation-antipattern/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 12:01:49 UTC