Re: VCTF Use Cases update

> On Jan 26, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com> wrote:
> 
> As we discussed briefly in the call today, we are gaining traction on the use cases document.  Gregg, Brian, Daniel, and I will be working on it going forward.
> 
> The general approach I have taken to get this rolling is:
>  • Start from the CCG use case document at [1]

Hi Shane,

Is there emerging consensus from interviews on core use cases (that may be a subset of the CG use cases doc)?

Ian


>  • Restructure to be more like the Web Payments Working Group use cases document at [2]
>  • Organize around the major operations that can be peformed on / with a Verifiable Claim.
>  • Extract core requirements with associated use cases from the CCG Google Doc use case document [3] and the CCG anonymized use cases that came in from the industry survey as reflected at [4]
>  • In parallel, write up a *simple* illustration of a basic flow for a Verifiable Claim in the wild that we can use as an introduction to the concepts.
> There is still a lot of work to do here.  I will be coordinating closely with the other volunteer editors. We are operating on github, using branches and pull requests.  Feel free to observe, comment, or assist!
> 
> [1] http://www.opencreds.org/specs/source/use-cases
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/web-payments-use-cases/
> [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GySrTXAYpwa4vDPsGE3BMA42FwIAqAyLGigKuKUTGks/edit#
> [4] http://opencreds.org/presentations/2015/w3c-tpac/anonymized.html
> --
> -Shane

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447

Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:01:42 UTC