- From: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:12:16 -0600
- To: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-ig@w3.org" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJdbnOAKLM+XtuDHLuoisDzLgkqCGMcr1YVzuBXzSOdkE+_4dw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for looking into using the WebRTC structures. As to separate repos - I understand your rationale. How did you deal with common terminology / glossary stuff? On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, I'm checking into the possibility of duplicating the WebRTC github > setup for our work. Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux, developer of many of the > tools editors have been using, including the PubRules checker, has been > building up tooling for us in WebRTC, including Travis scripts. I think we > could benefit from borrowing what he's set up. > > I will ask the WebRTC Chairs in today's WebRTC editors' call if they have > any problems with it, and if not I'll talk with Dom to see what would be > needed. We have a few publication oddities that would need to be adjusted. > > Regarding repositories, many groups differ in opinion on how separated the > different specs in their groupls should be. Having started with the two > primary WebRTC specs being together but eventually separating them because > they progressed independently, I would highly recommend a separate > repository for each but with a common initial name, e.g., vctf-use-cases > for this document. > > -- dan > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com> > wrote: > >> No - I don't think they have been published yet. >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Today in the VCTF call I and a few others offered to get the use cases >>> into W3C form and cleaned up. I would like to get started on this straight >>> away. >>> >>> Hi Shane, >>> >>> Do you have a link to the minutes of the meeting? Thanks, >>> >>> Ian >>> >>> > >>> > I know that we are working on github [1]. Is there any reason not to >>> put the documents in that tree? And if they are in that tree, does it make >>> sense to put then under some top level folder (documents?) or should each >>> document be in its own top level folder (usecases)? >>> > >>> > [1] https://github.com/w3c/vctf >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > -Shane >>> >>> -- >>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -Shane >> > > -- -Shane
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 15:12:49 UTC