- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:38:34 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
On 11/14/2015 7:39 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 11/14/2015 12:14 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: >> Right now there has been no veto, only discussion. I think the best >> way forward is to have as complete a proposal as we can get, >> including the CG’s preferences. > The complete proposal is here, and has been updated with all the input > we have (as far as I know): > > https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/VerifiableClaimsTaskForce > > What's missing? I don't know what else to add/change. I agree with Manu that this looks like a sufficiently complete proposal to drive a discussion. > > The only thing that's going to move the proposal forward is discussion > with the people that have an issue with the proposal. > >> There are also staff discussions happening, and a more complete >> proposal will facilitate those discussions. There is not yet any >> concrete suggestion from the staff perspective, and there won’t be by >> Monday. > Can we get the staff that's discussing this on the call on Monday so > that we can have more direct communication with them? If not Monday, > then at some point next week so that we can hash this through before we > have to discuss it as a group on Nov. 23rd? > > -- manu >
Received on Monday, 16 November 2015 13:38:39 UTC