- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:11:29 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
- Message-Id: <86B69FAD-6E3D-4360-9205-1D3C101F64EC@w3.org>
> On Nov 14, 2015, at 6:39 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 11/14/2015 12:14 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: >> Right now there has been no veto, only discussion. I think the best >> way forward is to have as complete a proposal as we can get, >> including the CG’s preferences. > > The complete proposal is here, and has been updated with all the input > we have (as far as I know): > > https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/VerifiableClaimsTaskForce Thank you for adding the problem statement bits; I will look more closely early this week. > > What's missing? I don't know what else to add/change. > > The only thing that's going to move the proposal forward is discussion > with the people that have an issue with the proposal. > >> There are also staff discussions happening, and a more complete >> proposal will facilitate those discussions. There is not yet any >> concrete suggestion from the staff perspective, and there won’t be by >> Monday. > > Can we get the staff that's discussing this on the call on Monday so > that we can have more direct communication with them? If not Monday, > then at some point next week so that we can hash this through before we > have to discuss it as a group on Nov. 23rd? My understanding is that relevant staff will be at the 23 Nov call. Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Sunday, 15 November 2015 15:11:32 UTC