W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments-ig@w3.org > March 2015

RE: [use_cases] Add section on anticipated work for other payment flows?

From: David Jackson <david.dj.jackson@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4eb7e1f1-96e0-4da2-bd72-d88246e7cea9@default>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Agreed with the ideas to add P2P and Refund.

For the P2P work, that could be used in variations that include either (or both) the payer or payee being an individual.  So this could fit in Healthcare along with government and personal P2P.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:57 AM
To: Manu Sporny
Cc: Web Payments IG
Subject: [use_cases] Add section on anticipated work for other payment flows?

Hi Manu,

I was chatting with Dave Raggett today about other flows we have the sense people will want to see in the use cases document, specifically:

 * Refund
 * Person-to-person

It’s not clear to me we will have defined those flows (or included the corresponding use cases) in time for FPWD. Should we, however, include a short section (e.g., an appendix with title “Anticipated Work” where we list those additional flows as likely to be added post-FPWD?

Some of the narratives (e.g., Person-to-person cash payment, or the government ones) would then sensibly be part of that anticipated work.

Ian

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 19:49:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:33 UTC