W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webpayments-ig@w3.org > March 2015

RE: [outreach] Re: Executive summary / Group goals

From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:19:44 -0400
To: "'David Ezell'" <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>, <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <217401d05c30$55e83010$01b89030$@gmail.com>
+1 to all of David's points.......:-)



* katie *
 
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
 
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile |
Office: 703-371-5545

-----Original Message-----
From: David Ezell [mailto:David_E3@VERIFONE.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:03 PM
To: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: [outreach] Re: Executive summary / Group goals

Hi Ian:

Just a few points on the Executive Summary[1].

In email Sun, 1 Mar 2015 01:09:02 +0000[2], I wrote:

>I think "level playing field (aka fair competition) for merchants, 
>payment providers, customers, software vendors, and payment networks" 
>is only represented in the Executive Summary if you squint really hard.  I
believe we should call it out more clearly.

*High Priority*
I've not found where this point is called out in the new edition. Because
the point comes from the minutes of our Utrecht meeting, if it is really a
non-goal I think we should decide that.  I might have missed it someplace -
apologies in advance if I have.

>I would also recommend adding "portability of application," i.e. "5 
>screens" - destop, tablet, mobile, tv, auto.  The ability to move 
>>between< these devices is a (to me) a key compelling reason for the 
>kinds of things we're proposing (e.g. user enters data on mobile, uses in
auto).  I realize we need use cases to spell it out, but this kind of
application portability is a core benefit of the Open Web Platform.
"Interoperable" is mentioned in the first sentence under "Goals" but I think
we need a little more.

This is just my attempt to get us to be a bit more specific about
interoperability in the way W3C views that.  It might not be clear to
everyone, especially those outside or new to W3C what we mean by >device<
interoperability.

The implied definition of "interoperability" in the "Goals" section doesn't
align with this idea, and neither does the implied definition of
"portability" listed as a bullet.

>while "cart abandonment" is a problem, my hunch is that on mobile 
>devices people use web sites to check prices; they buy things at home.

All I'm trying to say is that I don't think we know exactly what causes cart
abandonment, and I would hate for that to become a metric for the
effectiveness of what we're doing.

Best regards,
David

[1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/ExecSummary
[2]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments-ig/2015Mar/0000.html
________________________________
This electronic message, including attachments, is intended only for the use
of the individual or company named above or to which it is addressed. The
information contained in this message shall be considered confidential and
proprietary, and may include confidential work product. If you are not the
intended recipient, please be aware that any unauthorized use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and deleting this email immediately.
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2015 19:20:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:33 UTC