Re: Thanks to all and next steps

With special thanks to Erik as well as to David, Ian, Dave and Manu for
their leadership alongside Karen and Jeff.

Look forward to going deeper into Identity, Credentials and Web Based
Settlements whilst the Web Payment IG moves forward.

Happy Fathers Day to all Fathers~!

Cheers,
Arie

--

Heritage & Legacy Advisory | Multi-Generational Wealth Preservation

Arie Y. LEVY-COHEN
FINANCIAL ADVISOR | INTERNATIONAL CLIENT ADVISOR
ECONOMICS | FINANCE | BLOCKCHAIN TECH
PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT
P: 917.692.6999

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net> wrote:

> Hi.
> it was nice to meet every attendees at NY F2F meeting.
>
> one concern I have is
> the key management part of core and security of capabilities for Payment.
>
> it seams to use cryptography mainly focusing public key infrastructure.
>
> for the purpose of non-repudiation,
> I can find existing standards.
> ISO/IEC 13888-1/2/3, 10181-4 describes non-repudiation framework with
> symmetric or asymmetric algorithms.
>
> when we handle cryptography, we don't need to narrow to PKI or asymmetric
> algorithms.
>
> I added my comments on
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FbHscEFUA1P6Frm9h-98bgBF8oCNNu3_0BZh8l7Aa0c
>
> best regards
> mountie
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to everyone that attended and participated in the 2015 W3C Web
>> Payments face-to-face in NYC. I was particularly thrilled during the
>> roundtable as the message the group members were delivering demonstrated
>> an aligned vision. What's more impressive is the people that are
>> participating and the short time that it took to put this new effort
>> together and align our direction.
>>
>> There's still much more work to do, but my confidence that we can pull
>> this Web Payments stuff off is the highest it has ever been.
>>
>> I was just reviewing the goals of the meeting and had a few thoughts for
>> the coming weeks:
>>
>> > Prioritize payments use cases and the capabilities necessary to
>> > fulfill them.
>>
>> We came out of the face-to-face with a solid list of use cases:
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/FTF_June2015/UseCasesForVersion1
>>
>> I don't think we identified all the capabilities needed for V1, but with
>> a well-defined list of use cases, I think we'll be able to do a good job
>> with the capabilities over the next several weeks.
>>
>> I'm going to go through the use cases and update all the V1 use cases
>> with the clarifications made throughout the face-to-face meetings. I'll
>> also list the use cases in the Roadmap document.
>>
>> > Review draft charter(s) and plan for first round of standardization
>>
>> Quite a bit of work went into the Payment Architecture WG charter and I
>> think we have enough feedback to draw up a draft charter that can get
>> consensus from the group via the mailing list.
>>
>> I don't think we can say the same for the Authentication WG charters or
>> the Credentials WG charter.
>>
>> Next steps for the PAWG charter seem to be for Ian to revise it and pass
>> it by the group.
>>
>> Next steps for the Authentication WG charters seem to be for us to
>> identify capabilities that we can put into those charters.
>>
>> Next steps for the Credentials WG charter seems to be to coordinate w/
>> the Credentials CG and try to get more support from outside of this group.
>>
>> > Initiate discussion on other IG activities (to follow push towards
>> > launch of standard(s) groups).
>>
>> I don't think we really spent too much time discussing this, other than
>> "focus on V2, external liaisons, and supporting the WGs".
>>
>> Next steps may be to back burner this until after the PAWG is launched.
>>
>> > Solicit feedback from broader community on group's direction (via
>> > the roundtable)
>>
>> The feedback that we heard during the roundtable was probably best
>> summarized by what was not said; there didn't seem to be an objection
>> for the current direction. There were concerns over privacy and level
>> playing field. The cocktail reception discussions didn't reveal (to me)
>> any concerns about the current scope of work around payments.
>>
>> The biggest criticism seemed to be a lack of near-term focus on identity
>> and credentials, but that may be my bias kicking in.
>>
>> Next steps would probably be to establish deeper connections with the
>> Roundtable attendees and ensure that they're involved in future reviews.
>>
>> All in all, I think we made excellent progress. Thank you for all the
>> great comments, input, and discussion.
>>
>> -- manu
>>
>> --
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
>> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mountie Lee
>
> PayGate
> CTO, CISSP
> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
> E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
>
>