- From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:59:54 -0400
- To: "'Ian Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: "'Web Payments IG'" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
+1 * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Senior Accessibility SME (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 -----Original Message----- From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:59 AM To: Manu Sporny Cc: Web Payments IG Subject: Re: Mirroring posts to Web Payments CG? > On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > Due to the funky way that the Web Payments IG mailing list is setup, > the Web Payments CG members can't easily subscribe and respond to this > mailing list traffic (even though it is public). Why not? Ian > > This was okay for the first couple of months while the new group was > finding its footing. Now that we almost have a FPWD out, I'd like to > see if we can rope in some of the expertise of the CG (there are 200+ > members in that group). > > Here's what I propose: > > My organization sets up a script to clone any mail sent to this > mailing list to the Web Payments CG list. The Reply-To headers are > changed to the public-webpayments-ig-comments mailing list. > > This will ensure that web payments CG participants start hearing > what's going on week-to-week in this group and are able to respond to > our public comments mailing list while traffic on this mailing list > (public-webpayments-ig) is kept to W3C members. > > Clearly, I won't do this until we have consensus. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments > http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 14:00:57 UTC