Re: Support for Verifiable Claims

Well said.

> On 27 Oct. 2016, at 11:12 am, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:
> 
> My concern is not that I don't think enough organizations think something should be done about verifying claims; my concern is about a pattern we've had in creating working groups to address abstract problem spaces, without concrete plans and concrete implementations.  The reason we've been championing incubation of new standards in CGs lately has been, as I put it at the TPAC meeting, to enable efforts to fail gracefully - that is, to avoid prematurely baked an abstract solution into a "standard" before it's been fire-tested in the real world.

--
Mark Nottingham    mnot@akamai.com    https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 06:11:24 UTC