- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:16:31 -0700
- To: David Wood <david.wood@ephox.com>
- Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Rinke Hoekstra <rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl>, "w3c-ac-forum@w3.org" <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-comments@w3.org" <public-webpayments-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJK2wqW2xsJtC8dcrgu7oiw792Y3xZOwvhWVTfQbm=kwhycjiA@mail.gmail.com>
Actually, this is not a formal AC review of a proposed charter; it's a pre-view of said proposal, which as I understand it will be formally proposed to the AC sometime in November. On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Wood <david.wood@ephox.com> wrote: > Hi Tantek, > > No, this is an AC review of a proposed working group charter in compliance > with the W3C Process, section 5.2.3. > > > On Thursday, 27 October 2016, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, is this just a big cheerleading technology wishlist >> thread, or are y'all actively implementing verifiable claims >> prototypes and trying them on the open web? >> >> (I didn't see "implement", "prototype", or "incubate" mentioned in any >> of the chain of +1s previous in the thread, mostly just "contribute" >> which I suppose we are all doing by emailing about it, but we can do >> that within existing IGs/CGs.) >> >> I want a verified pony as much as the next person, but at some point >> the framing starts to look more like a solution looking for problems >> (or problems aspirationally assuming they'll be solved by a claimed >> foundational panacea) rather than something that actually benefits the >> web platform directly. >> >> E.g. perhaps pick one specific area that verifiable claims may >> potentially benefit that needs something like it badly (up to >> advocates to prototype/demonstrate workability to be sure), like >> WoT/IoT, which is currently beset by the wide deployment and >> misdirection[1] of quite a few "unverified" devices. >> >> (just did a quick web search on "verifiable claims" "web of things" >> and found a few pages that mention both, but nothing that actually >> connected these two in any substantive way. Hard to believe this email >> is the first suggestion thereof, earlier references welcome.) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tantek Çelik >> AB member >> Web Standards Lead, Mozilla >> >> [1] I.e. I assume y'all have seen: >> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/10/hacked-cameras-dvrs-powe >> red-todays-massive-internet-outage/ >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Rinke Hoekstra <rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl> >> wrote: >> > Dear All, >> > >> > The Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam also supports the Verifiable Claims WG >> Charter, and is looking forward to contributing. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Rinke Hoekstra >> > >> > >> > >> >> On 21 Oct 2016, at 20:20, j.j.spaanderman@dnb.nl wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 to the Verifiable Claims WG charter on behalf of DNB. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jurgen >> >> >> >> Van: Hakkinen, Mark T >> >> Verzonden: vrijdag 21 oktober 2016 20:08 >> >> Aan: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org >> >> Cc: public-webpayments-comments@w3.org >> >> Onderwerp: RE: Support for Verifiable Claims >> >> >> >> +1 to the verifiable claims working group charter >> http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/ >> >> >> >> Educational Testing Service supports this charter and looks forward to >> contributing to the work of the group. >> >> >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Markku (Mark) T. Hakkinen, PhD >> >> Managing Sr. Research Developer >> >> Accessibility, Standards, and Assistive Technology Research Group >> >> Center for Cognitive, Accessibility, and Technology Sciences >> >> Educational Testing Service >> >> Rosedale Road >> >> Princeton, New Jersey >> >> 08541 USA >> >> +1 609 734 5014 <(609)%20734-5014> >> >> mhakkinen@ets.org >> >> http://www.ets.org >> >> >> >> >> >> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged >> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for >> whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this >> e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, >> distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this >> information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail >> is prohibited. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thank you for your compliance. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> De informatie verzonden met dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en >> uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u als niet-geadresseerde >> dit bericht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht direct de afzender hierover te >> informeren en het bericht te vernietigen. Gebruik van informatie door >> onbevoegden, openbaarmaking of vermenigvuldiging is verboden en kan leiden >> tot aansprakelijkheid. >> >> >> >> De afzender is niet aansprakelijk voor schade die verband houdt met >> risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. De e-mails >> en eventueel bijgevoegde bestanden zijn volgens een standaardprocedure >> gecontroleerd op computervirussen. Deze controle kan aanwezigheid van >> malware, zoals virussen, echter niet geheel uitsluiten. >> >> >> >> The information sent in or enclosed with this email is confidential >> and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this email but >> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and >> delete the message. Please be advised that the unauthorised use, >> disclosure, dissemination or distribution of information is prohibited by >> law and may entail liability. >> >> >> >> The sender cannot be held liable for damage in connection with risks >> inherent in electronic message transfer. The sender has taken standard >> precautions to verify no computer viruses are present in this email or any >> attachments it may contain. However, the presence of malware, such as >> viruses, cannot be ruled out. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > -- > Regards, > Dave > -- > David Wood > >
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 00:17:05 UTC