- From: David Wood <david.wood@ephox.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:03:12 +1000
- To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: Rinke Hoekstra <rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl>, "w3c-ac-forum@w3.org" <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-comments@w3.org" <public-webpayments-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABdBTrZ38ptU3tO_UpqrNmoPaqZVXfthJvf8-SL3yHyg69CjDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tantek, No, this is an AC review of a proposed working group charter in compliance with the W3C Process, section 5.2.3. On Thursday, 27 October 2016, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tantek@cs.stanford.edu');>> wrote: > Out of curiosity, is this just a big cheerleading technology wishlist > thread, or are y'all actively implementing verifiable claims > prototypes and trying them on the open web? > > (I didn't see "implement", "prototype", or "incubate" mentioned in any > of the chain of +1s previous in the thread, mostly just "contribute" > which I suppose we are all doing by emailing about it, but we can do > that within existing IGs/CGs.) > > I want a verified pony as much as the next person, but at some point > the framing starts to look more like a solution looking for problems > (or problems aspirationally assuming they'll be solved by a claimed > foundational panacea) rather than something that actually benefits the > web platform directly. > > E.g. perhaps pick one specific area that verifiable claims may > potentially benefit that needs something like it badly (up to > advocates to prototype/demonstrate workability to be sure), like > WoT/IoT, which is currently beset by the wide deployment and > misdirection[1] of quite a few "unverified" devices. > > (just did a quick web search on "verifiable claims" "web of things" > and found a few pages that mention both, but nothing that actually > connected these two in any substantive way. Hard to believe this email > is the first suggestion thereof, earlier references welcome.) > > Thanks, > > Tantek Çelik > AB member > Web Standards Lead, Mozilla > > [1] I.e. I assume y'all have seen: > https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/10/hacked-cameras-dvrs-powe > red-todays-massive-internet-outage/ > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Rinke Hoekstra <rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl> > wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > The Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam also supports the Verifiable Claims WG > Charter, and is looking forward to contributing. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rinke Hoekstra > > > > > > > >> On 21 Oct 2016, at 20:20, j.j.spaanderman@dnb.nl wrote: > >> > >> +1 to the Verifiable Claims WG charter on behalf of DNB. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Jurgen > >> > >> Van: Hakkinen, Mark T > >> Verzonden: vrijdag 21 oktober 2016 20:08 > >> Aan: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org > >> Cc: public-webpayments-comments@w3.org > >> Onderwerp: RE: Support for Verifiable Claims > >> > >> +1 to the verifiable claims working group charter > http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/ > >> > >> Educational Testing Service supports this charter and looks forward to > contributing to the work of the group. > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> -- > >> Markku (Mark) T. Hakkinen, PhD > >> Managing Sr. Research Developer > >> Accessibility, Standards, and Assistive Technology Research Group > >> Center for Cognitive, Accessibility, and Technology Sciences > >> Educational Testing Service > >> Rosedale Road > >> Princeton, New Jersey > >> 08541 USA > >> +1 609 734 5014 > >> mhakkinen@ets.org > >> http://www.ets.org > >> > >> > >> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > >> > >> > >> Thank you for your compliance. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> De informatie verzonden met dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en > uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u als niet-geadresseerde > dit bericht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht direct de afzender hierover te > informeren en het bericht te vernietigen. Gebruik van informatie door > onbevoegden, openbaarmaking of vermenigvuldiging is verboden en kan leiden > tot aansprakelijkheid. > >> > >> De afzender is niet aansprakelijk voor schade die verband houdt met > risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. De e-mails > en eventueel bijgevoegde bestanden zijn volgens een standaardprocedure > gecontroleerd op computervirussen. Deze controle kan aanwezigheid van > malware, zoals virussen, echter niet geheel uitsluiten. > >> > >> The information sent in or enclosed with this email is confidential and > intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this email but are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete > the message. Please be advised that the unauthorised use, disclosure, > dissemination or distribution of information is prohibited by law and may > entail liability. > >> > >> The sender cannot be held liable for damage in connection with risks > inherent in electronic message transfer. The sender has taken standard > precautions to verify no computer viruses are present in this email or any > attachments it may contain. However, the presence of malware, such as > viruses, cannot be ruled out. > >> > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Dave -- David Wood
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 00:03:48 UTC