- From: Jorge Zaccaro <jzaccaro@playbanq.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 03:30:19 -0500
- To: public-webpayments-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAG2U-pw-ZLH3P9Db9DC1J=k1q49Fhm4JgL9q93dkedhaW4CJmw@mail.gmail.com>
I think it's a very valid and important question, since it could help us arrive at a common understanding and terminology. For me, a digital wallet is a resource that is able to: *1.* Store credentials *2.* Participate in transactions However, > any definition of "wallet" is going to be so generic and useless as to not help direct the work Then, I would suggest to change the term/question to "What is a Web Wallet?" (as I argued in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments/2014Oct/0105.html). > This goal seems awfully hard to combine with not developing technical standards +1. Jorge Zaccaro Fundador, Playbanq SAS Bogotá D.C., Colombia +57 300 673 0039 +1 650 614 1707 www.playbanq.com On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > Pardon me for such a naive question but I think there might be reasons > discussing this a bit. > > In a physical wallet you simple take out (select) the payment instrument > (check, card, cash, etc) to use while the rest of the process is carried > out in an entirely payment-instrument-dependent way. > > A digital wallet would (as a minimum) allow you to enumerate, select and > initiate a payment process while the actual payment process would as in the > physical wallet case be depending on the selected payment instrument. > > Now to my "problem"... > > http://www.w3.org/2014/04/payments/webpayments_charter.html > "Development of technical standards is not in scope for the Interest Group" > > http://www.w3.org/2014/10/payments.html.en > "The Interest Group will first focus on digital wallets, which many in > industry consider an effective way to reduce fraud and improve privacy by > having users share sensitive information only with payment providers, > rather than merchants" > > This goal seems awfully hard to combine with not developing technical > standards. > > Since recommending somebody else's wallet solution would be politically > incorrect, the only realistic deliverable appears to be a set of > requirements for actors to consider when selecting a particular wallet > solution. Personally I don't see this as a natural task for a technical > SDO like W3C. > > FWIW, people associated with the WebPayment CG have already published a > couple of wallet schemes: > https://github.com/playbanq/WebWalletAPI > https://mobilepki.org/WebCryptoPlusPlus > > Although the solutions are quite different, it is worth nothing that they > both put themselves inside of the actual payment transactions. > > Regards, > AndersR > >
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 08:30:47 UTC