- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:34:20 -0500
- To: Nicolas Rouquette <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 13:03 -0700, Nicolas Rouquette wrote: > Dan, > > I had received an email from Daniele Turi where he asked if I had done / > could do / wanted to do something to help (can't remember which). > > Shortly afterwards, the Mindswappers visited JPL and I brought up this > issue to Bijan's attention. > Apparently, there was already enough cooks tinkering w/ the API between > the mindwappers, > Holger (then at Stanford) and the Jena folks. Ah... I'm glad you got in touch with various developers. > > I've peeked at the CVS repository and noticed the abstract grammar that > Daniele originally wrote > hasn't changed -- > http://owlapi.cvs.sourceforge.net/owlapi/owl/abstractparser/grammar/ > but the lexer has and so did the renderers. > > Are my concerns still applicable? I'd have to take a look; > unfortunately, I'm overbooked as it is with my current tasks > to have much time looking into it. However, my comments > were very detailed. As far as I can tell, the details are about the OWLAPI source code (which W3C does not maintain), not about the OWL specification documents (which W3C does maintain). > If I had idle students around, I'd put > one to take a look at it -- after all, the language was designed > to be simple; how hard could it be for a student fresh out of > compiler construction 101? > > -- Nicolas. > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > Hi. I just discovered your message of May 2005. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2005May/0005.html > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 18 August 2006 20:34:53 UTC