Re: Wine ontology again

Thank you for clarifying that for me. Now that you mention the UNA  
situation I remember seeing a post about it on some related mailing- 
list but it had completely slipped my mind. Could you mention any  
timeframe within which the new version of Racer, not assuming UNA,  
would be available?

Cheers,

Jakob

On 01/28/2004 01:42:32 AM, Volker Haarslev wrote:
> On 27-Jan-04, at 18:30, Jakob Henriksson wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hi, I need some help. I can't seem to get the wine ontology [1] to  
>> work. From earlier posts on w3 realated mailing-lists I have  
>> gathered that there has been some problems with this ontology.
>> 
>> First of all, is [1] the correct (i.e. most up-to-date) wine  
>> ontology? I am using the ontology together with RACER [2]. The  
>> problem is that I can't realize the ABox. I am told that the ABox is  
>> incoherent and that doesn't sound right. Anyone with similar  
>> experience?
>> 
>> Any suggestions, pointers or ideas would be much appreciated.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Racer still assumes the unique name assumption (UNA) for individuals.  
> Therefore, Racer finds the wine Abox inconsistent. This should be  
> fixed soon because we are working on a pre-alpha release of Racer  
> (version 1.8) that does not assume the UNA anymore as default. It  
> will be possible to optionally switch on the UNA.
> 
>> Jakob
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/wine.rdf
>> [2] http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/~r.f.moeller/racer/
>> 
>>
> 
> Regards, Volker Haarslev
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Volker Haarslev, Dr. habil.
> Associate Professor
> Computer Science Department
> Concordia University
> 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.
> Montreal, Quebec  H3G 1M8, Canada
> Phone: +1 (514) 848-2424 ext. 3049 (new number)
> Fax: +1 (514) 848-2830
> Email: haarslev@cs.concordia.ca
> http://www.cs.concordia.ca/~haarslev/
>

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 02:13:26 UTC