- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:11:38 -0800
- To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
you are correct . section 4 discusses features that are added in OWL DL and OWL Full and both of these languages use the same vocabulary. deborah Benjamin Nowack wrote: > >OWL Web Ontology Language Overview" document[1]: > >Section 4. Incremental Language Description of >OWL DL and OWL FULL: ><snip> >disjointWith: OWL Full allows the statement that >classes are disjoint. ></snip> > >doesn't this apply to OWL DL as well? > >benjamin > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ > >______________________________ >Benjamin Nowack >bnowack@appmosphere.com > >Kruppstrasse 82-100 >45145 Essen, Germany > > > > -- Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory 353 Serra Mall Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/index.html (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 14:13:19 UTC