- From: Evren Sirin <evren@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 03:48:37 -0500
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, Michael Grove <mhgrove@hotmail.com>
The Pellet results have been updated now. The results for these 5 test cases have been changed to 2 "pass", 2 "no data" and 1 "fail". We don't think any of these test cases are wrong but this is how much Pellet can handle. The new results for each test case are given inline. Evren > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:48:30 +0000 > From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > > Hello all > > we noted that five tests currently have recorded [1] one pass, and one > fail, with the failure being from Pellet. > > In order to allow us to suggest to the Working Group that these tests > should be approved, or to allow us to improve the tests please can you > inspect both the tests and the algorithms you have used, and determine > whether you think the tests are correct or not. > > The tests in question are > I5.3-014 Pellet cannot handle domain restrictions on rdf:type, result is changed to "no data". > I5.5-007 Pellet cannot handle ill-formed lists in entailments, result is changed to "no data". > someValuesFrom-001 The error is fixed, result is changed to "Pass". > Restriction-006 The error is fixed, result is changed to "Pass". > Thing-005 (need to regenerate test results to see this one) This test case is true only in OWL Full semantics and not in OWL DL so the result is still "Fail" (same for Thing-003). > > If you could reply copying public-webont-comments@w3.org, this would > be very helpful, especially if you could do so by Wednesday, so that > we could propose approving those of these tests that you believe are > correct at the Thursday WebOnt telecon. > > thanks > > Jeremy Carroll, on behalf of Test subgroup of WebOnt WG > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out
Received on Monday, 24 November 2003 12:25:35 UTC