- From: <Bernardo.Cuenca@uv.es>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:51:52 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Christoph Mangold <Mangold@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Hi ,
OWL-DL is considered equivalent to the SHOIN(D) description logics (
an extension of ALC including transitive roles, role hierarchies,
nominals, inverse roles, unqualified number restrictiones and
datatypes).
A mapping can be established between OWL-DL entailment and concept
satisfiability in SHOIN(D) and thus the decidability of OWL-DL
entailment can be proved from the known decidability of SHOIN(D).
For more details, there a couple of interesting papers published this
year that provide a deep insight on these topics:
-" From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language"
writen by Ian Horrocks, P.F. Patel-Schneider and F.Van Harmelen
"Reducing OWL-entailment to Description Logic Satisfiability"
by Ian Horrocks and P.F. Patel-Schneider
These papers can be downloaded from Ian Horrock's web site.
If you are not familiar with description logics get a copy of the
description logics handbook.
Viel Glück !
Bernardo Cuenca
Department of Computer Science
University of Valencia
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to the owl subject and I don't know if this is the
appropriate
> place to ask my question.
>
> As far as I understand, OWL DL is the part of OWL that enables a
sound and
> complete inference calculus and where the entailment of statements is
> decidable. I just couldn't find any proofs for these properties of
OWL DL.
> Can anyone give me directions?
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
> -----------------
> Christoph Mangold
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 03:53:28 UTC