- From: <Bernardo.Cuenca@uv.es>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:51:52 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Christoph Mangold <Mangold@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Hi , OWL-DL is considered equivalent to the SHOIN(D) description logics ( an extension of ALC including transitive roles, role hierarchies, nominals, inverse roles, unqualified number restrictiones and datatypes). A mapping can be established between OWL-DL entailment and concept satisfiability in SHOIN(D) and thus the decidability of OWL-DL entailment can be proved from the known decidability of SHOIN(D). For more details, there a couple of interesting papers published this year that provide a deep insight on these topics: -" From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language" writen by Ian Horrocks, P.F. Patel-Schneider and F.Van Harmelen "Reducing OWL-entailment to Description Logic Satisfiability" by Ian Horrocks and P.F. Patel-Schneider These papers can be downloaded from Ian Horrock's web site. If you are not familiar with description logics get a copy of the description logics handbook. Viel Glück ! Bernardo Cuenca Department of Computer Science University of Valencia > > Hi, > > I am new to the owl subject and I don't know if this is the appropriate > place to ask my question. > > As far as I understand, OWL DL is the part of OWL that enables a sound and > complete inference calculus and where the entailment of statements is > decidable. I just couldn't find any proofs for these properties of OWL DL. > Can anyone give me directions? > > Thanks > Chris > > ----------------- > Christoph Mangold > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 03:53:28 UTC