- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:46:19 -0400
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
I've been developing a fairly naive OWL Full implementation based on simply creating first-order axioms for OWL, turning RDF into triples like rdf(uri1, uri2, uri3) and feeding the results to Otter. There's a python wrapper for Otter to do the translation, feed it OWL test cases, etc. Web page is http://www.w3.org/2003/08/surnia/ When last I looked at it (about two weeks ago), it was passing 76% of the approved Positive Entailment Tests, which are by far the easiest tests for it. It's hard to tell whether its difficulties are due to flaws in the axioms, my lack of giving Otter appropriate guidance through the search space, or the fundamental limitations of this approach. -- sandro
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 13:46:19 UTC