- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isis.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:25:37 -0400
- To: public comments <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 01:36 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote: [snip prior comment] Whoops, I forgot to add: What happens with multiple O rdf:type owl:Ontology s? Reference says that there are "generally *at most* one" (emph added). I see several reading of the mapping table reversed, including having to generate two Ontology(...)s which differ only by their Annotation s. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 14:23:36 UTC