O rdf:type Ontology repeatable? (was Re: O rdf:type owl:Ontology optional?) from Bijan Parsia on 2003-08-08 (public-webont-comments@w3.org from August 2003)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isis.unc.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:25:37 -0400
To: public comments <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B4F3F33E-C9CD-11D7-9419-0003939E0B44@isis.unc.edu>

On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 01:36  PM, Bijan Parsia wrote:
[snip prior comment]

Whoops, I forgot to add:
	What happens with multiple O rdf:type owl:Ontology s?

Reference says that there are "generally *at most* one" (emph added). I 
see several reading of the mapping table reversed, including having to 
generate two Ontology(...)s which differ only by their Annotation s.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.

Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 14:23:36 UTC