- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:17:07 -0400
- To: "Nikola" <nikola.stojanovic@acm.org>, <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
At 4:07 PM -0400 4/15/03, Nikola wrote: ><Jim Hendler> >Nikola - please let us know if this message addressed your question, and >whether you would like to see the specific words that Mike will add to the >reference document to address this issue. ></Jim Hendler> > >Yes, it does. It looks to me that it would be helpful to add the explanation >about naming convention to the reference document. As it could be hinted >from my previous post, I was assuming (by just looking into their names that >have common suffix "Property") that both owl:equivalentProperty and >owl:TransitiveProperty are some kind of properties, but then there is this >distinction in naming (lower / upper) that hinted something else. > >Also, should there be another rule that doesn't allow using suffix / prefix >/ ... like "Property" in classes like owl:TransitiveProperty. Or, >"P(p)roperty" should not be used in any names at all? > >NB: I am just starting with OWL / RDF / ... so I realize that I might be off >with some of the above. > >Regards, >Nikola I'm glad Mike's response helped and answered your question. The mailing list www-rdf-logic@w3.org is available for open discussion of RDF/RDFS/OWL issues relating to logic, properties, etc. and is a good place to get help as you learn the langauge - people there will be happy to help you out as you progress. -Jim H. WOWG chair -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 18:17:13 UTC