- From: Nikola <nikola.stojanovic@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:07:39 -0400
- To: <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
<Jim Hendler> Nikola - please let us know if this message addressed your question, and whether you would like to see the specific words that Mike will add to the reference document to address this issue. </Jim Hendler> Yes, it does. It looks to me that it would be helpful to add the explanation about naming convention to the reference document. As it could be hinted from my previous post, I was assuming (by just looking into their names that have common suffix "Property") that both owl:equivalentProperty and owl:TransitiveProperty are some kind of properties, but then there is this distinction in naming (lower / upper) that hinted something else. Also, should there be another rule that doesn't allow using suffix / prefix / ... like "Property" in classes like owl:TransitiveProperty. Or, "P(p)roperty" should not be used in any names at all? NB: I am just starting with OWL / RDF / ... so I realize that I might be off with some of the above. Regards, Nikola
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 16:07:39 UTC