- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 06:44:49 -0400
- To: tolle@dbis.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org, christop@ics.forth.gr
As Jos de Roo implied, a recent decision of the RDF Core WG has added rdf:List, rdf:first, rdf:rest, and rdf:nil and rdf:ParseType="Collection" to RDF. This decision is so new that it had not even made it into any of the editor's draft documents for the RDF Core WG when the WebOnt documents were created. There is still only a note in the editor's draft of the new RDF syntax document at the beginning of http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Open-Issues As far as the WebOnt documents go, I just noticed that the abstract syntax document uses the owl: versions of these tokens, which is wrong, and will be changed. As far as I can tell the other documents do not have any errors in this area. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2002 06:45:12 UTC