- From: Jaewon Lee <jaeone@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 10:37:43 -0700
- To: public-webmachinelearning@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANA9qLK7WMwU9R1er_6BNENNp4f88mu5SHhvRTUGks=Jf2Ft9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi everyone, Thank you very much for the feedback on the Summarizer API preference parameter <https://github.com/webmachinelearning/writing-assistance-apis/issues/96> during last week's CG meeting <https://github.com/webmachinelearning/meetings/blob/main/telcons/2026-04-02-cg-agenda.md> .. I've incorporated your feedback and added clarifications to the spec via this PR <https://github.com/webmachinelearning/writing-assistance-apis/pull/102>. Specifically, this update details how we handle conflicting constraints and routing fallbacks (e.g., prioritizing functional capabilities over a "speed" preference when necessary). For reference, here is the original PR <https://github.com/webmachinelearning/writing-assistance-apis/pull/98> that added this parameter to the Writing Assistance APIs spec. We want to ensure the CG has time to weigh in before we merge, so I would greatly appreciate any additional reviews or comments you might have! Best, Jaewon
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2026 17:40:11 UTC