- From: Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:43:26 +0200
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, public-webizen@w3.org, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: >>> 2) CEO teleconference. Suggest changing "update" to "discussion" >> >> changed > > +1 by the way. > > A written Q&A session with a bunch of W3C staff (more or less whoever > you can get) is probably as good as a teleconference. Hearing a lecture > is a very slow way to get information, and there is relatively little > opportunity for most people to actually ask a question. +1000 >>> 3) What is a Webizen ID card? -1 until better understood >> >> It is an ID card with your webizen # on it. > > this seems like high cost (postage) for little benefit. Most people old > enough to spend $100 need a bigger wallet for the cards they have, not > another card. -1. Who would really care? >>> 5) T-shirt. +1 if fulfillment is managed by a third party (and >>> budget needs to take that into account) > > You need a 3rd party to handle production and distribution, the T-shirt > should be unique from year to year (is it an annual or one-time > benefit?), and the budget matters. If you really want to make a t-shirt then make it consistent with the message, eco-friendly, fair-trade, ... Or don't make it. >>> - What does it mean in practice for a Webizen to be associated with >>> an Office? >> >> Not sure since I didn't write that section. I've clarified based on >> my understanding. > > I hope it includes the idea that "a significant fraction of the fee paid > is made available to offices for translation of documents and real-time > interpretation of speakers at events, to encourage a more global > participation in W3C". If the money could be used for this, that would indeed be a great addition to the organization Regards JC
Received on Monday, 12 May 2014 07:44:00 UTC