RE: [minutes] 2014-05-05 Webizen task force meeting

Jeff,
It sounds more like a call for expertise then a real issue.
Lets keep it, but separate from issues, what do you think ?
Virginie

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Jaffe [mailto:jeff@w3.org]
Sent: mardi 6 mai 2014 15:10
To: GALINDO Virginie; Coralie Mercier; public-webizen@w3.org; Arthur Barstow
Subject: Re: [minutes] 2014-05-05 Webizen task force meeting


On 5/6/2014 5:49 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> Coralie and all,
>
> [Again apologize for missing the call, my ET-translation was actually
> wrong, I did not get it meant Boston.]
>
> A comment on the issues, highlighted on the wiki in section
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#June_discussion_at_the_W3C_Advisory_Co

> mmittee_Meeting I would not put in the list of issues the naming of
> the webizen projects. Name is about marketing/branding, and I am not sure AC rep are relevant for that task (some of them might be, but for example, I am not).

Alas I have no marketing council to rely on.  I plan to keep it on the agenda and hope that someone connects me to a marketer who can come up with the right name (or validate one of the existing choices in the wiki).  When (and if) we launch we will need a name.

>   This would make everyone giving opinion and lose focus on the actual questions which are the other ones, to my opinion...
>
> Regards,
> virginie
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Coralie Mercier [mailto:coralie@w3.org]
> Sent: mardi 6 mai 2014 09:00
> To: public-webizen@w3.org; Arthur Barstow
> Subject: Re: [minutes] 2014-05-05 Webizen task force meeting
>
>
> Hi Art,
>
> On Tue, 06 May 2014 03:26:05 +0200, Arthur Barstow
> <art.barstow@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/5/14 5:30 PM, Coralie Mercier wrote:
>>> The W3C Advisory Committee will hear about the program at their June
>>> meeting,
>> What is the probability you will be able to cobble together a
>> relatively solid proposal for review prior to the AC meeting? (The
>> idea being that rather than the AC meeting being used as an
>> introduction to the proposal, the related agenda topic is actually
>> issue-focused.)
> My understanding is that the agenda item will actually be issue-focused.
>
>>> and discuss the key issues.
>> Please identify the key issues in the wiki (preferably in a (new)
>> top-level section).
> I've made a separate section in the wiki:
>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#June_discussion_at_the_W3C_Advisory_Co

> mmittee_Meeting
>
> Coralie
>
>> -Thanks, AB
>
> --
>    Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Communications Team  -  http://www.w3.org

> mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001
> http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/

>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this
> transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for
> damages caused by a transmitted virus


This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 13:13:09 UTC