- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 06:44:46 -0400
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, "public-webizen@w3.org" <public-webizen@w3.org>
On 5/6/14 5:49 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > A comment on the issues, highlighted on the wiki in section https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#June_discussion_at_the_W3C_Advisory_Committee_Meeting > I would not put in the list of issues the naming of the webizen projects. Name is about marketing/branding, and I am not sure AC rep are relevant for that task (some of them might be, but for example, I am not). This would make everyone giving opinion and lose focus on the actual questions which are the other ones, to my opinion... I agree it generally isn't productive to spend f2f meeting time bikeshedding on personal preference type topics like `naming`. Presumably, this group will submit a `solid-2-slushy` proposal to the AC before the f2f meeting and if so, naming shouldn't be an explicit issue identified for discussion. Perhaps it would be helpful if whoever is `chairing` this group would put forward a proposal on the name. FWIW, although `webizen` isn't my favorite, it meets the "ICanLiveWithItTest". (Overall, I think it is >>> important to move the proposal forward than to quibble re the name.) -Cheers, AB
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 10:45:17 UTC