- From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:10:45 +0100
- To: "public-webizen@w3.org" <public-webizen@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 19:42:20 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > On 3/14/14 2:27 PM, ext Coralie Mercier wrote: >> Some of the feedback I got after tweeting today was that the proposal >> might be too vague. > > Well, if you used a term that actually included a bit of a `semantic > hook` f.ex. "Individual Membership" instead of using the [albeit > somewhat] `cutesy` "webizen", a more immediate connection to the purpose > might be [more] apparent ;-). > > -C,AB Hi Art, I think it would be confusing to call them "Individual Members". As you've found out (and updated the wiki [1] --thanks!), in the current proposal, webizens are not granted Membership rights. Therefore, I went and updated your edit. [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen#Non_Benefits Coralie -- Coralie Mercier - W3C Communications Team - http://www.w3.org mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 18:11:05 UTC