- From: Wouter Termont <woutermont@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 13:32:44 +0100
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM+hNO1TEVgDrkC_1qKHWkWQt4xVW4RW_Hz+r-N2f2owK5MoyA@mail.gmail.com>
I have a strong preference for not using yet another communication channel. It is hard enough to keep track of this mailing list next to GitHub. The specification document, and possibly a primer, should contain the definitions and enough examples to make WebID comprehensible to anyone. If that is not enough according to you, you are of course welcome to write more tutorials, and the CG could perhaps link to those. On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:14 AM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > We have a number of definitions which are *almost* defined but not quite > nailed down > > I suggest using the wiki as a place where we can iterate on definitions of > things like WebID and so on, based on ongoing discussions and clarifications > > This is useful because > > 1. It provides a stable URI for defining WebID etc. > 2. it allows ephemeral conversations to have a context and improve the > working definitions > 3. the WebID CG should be the place where a webid is defined > 4. Examples and other things like can back up the definitions > 5. Iterating on Github PRs may be at this point taking on too much and > tough to gain full consensus on the little details > > Once these definitions have sufficient contentions all specs implementing > WebID can proceed, based on a common understanding. > > New specs in and outside th group can be made quickly and consistently > using agreed upon text > > Any thoughts on this approach? >
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2024 12:33:26 UTC