Quoting Wouter Termont (2024-02-09 10:44:32) > Hi Martynas, > > You are right, the SPARQL specs also define a protocol. However, you fail > to address my questions: do you or do you not believe that WebID should > provide guaranteed interoperability? Because therein lies the difference > with SPARQL: WebID provides a _single_ crucial access point that > applications in the ecosystem will _need_ to access. This is a lot less > problematic for SPARQL: the same dataset might be available via other > interfaces, form other sources, and it is very use-case-dependent whether > access to that an endpoint is really necessary or not. I do *not* find it crucial for WebID to guarantee interoperability. Instead, I would expect addon specs like WebID-TLS, Solid OIDC and Webid-TLS+Delagation to each potentially offer such guarantee - but those are *not* interoperable with each other. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Friday, 9 February 2024 18:34:13 UTC