- From: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:08:39 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Hi Kingsley, Insofar as I can understand (but I hope someone will jump in and say otherwise), nobody is really representing Solid right now in any official or unofficial capacity. We do have people that are *also* involved in Solid but I do not believe they speak in any other capacity than their own. > I say that because Solid itself already supports both JSON-LD and Turtle. Indeed, that’s part of how we came to the MUST on Turtle and JSON-LD for publishers. All existing WebID providers support that, Solid included. Still, going back to Martynas point, I think a good case can be made for dropping all requirements on media types if acknowledging and addressing comments like those I referred to in my previous message. I am going to focus on PRs required to get to #37 but if anyone (Martynas?) can make a good case for it, maybe within a dedicated issue on GitHub, and manage to gather a larger consensus than the MUST on Turtle and JSON-LD has accrued, I would love to update #37 accordingly and move in that direction. Best, Jacopo.
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2024 13:09:01 UTC