- From: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:06:52 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Team Community Process <team-community-process@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
> I guess in the case when there is no chair, there's not interim process and then the proposed candidate becomes chair. Interesting, thanks for mentioning this. > While it seems to me that group consensus is that you should be chair if you want to be, a simple option would be to remove yourself as a chair, and then gain group consensus. But I think that is already there. So whichever way you prefer... I’m happy to chair as long as the group is happy to have me as a chair. I do not feel the need to remove myself as I’ve already received positive feedback and encouragement, also publicly on this list, but I’d be happy to do so if the group believes it’s the best way forward. The chair doesn’t get to decide who should be chair, the group does. Best. J.
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2023 10:07:13 UTC