- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:48:44 +0200
- To: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2023 15:49:01 UTC
čt 15. 6. 2023 v 17:43 odesílatel Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com> napsal: > Do the combined MUSTs on Turtle and JSON-LD also imply a MUST on the > availability of content-negotiation on the server’s side? If so, I think > that would be a mistake as it would cut off from compliance many “simple” > hosting solutions (e.g. GitHub Pages). If not, how would a client be able > to request a WebID in either of those formats? > Yes, it would imply content negotiation. I would personally prefer the "simple" hosting solution, but I dont think we have a huge window to make major changes though, as the solid WG will start later this year. Solid I believe mandates conneg, and BOTH Turthe and JSON-LD. So anything in WebID will have to work with that reality. There might be some text that accommodates both, but it would have to be done quickly and get consensus.
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2023 15:49:01 UTC