Re: Assessing consensus and our voting process

ne 9. 7. 2023 v 21:18 odesílatel Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
napsal:

> Kingsley, Nathan, Jonas, Melvin, Ruben,
>
> Thank you for stating your preference. I’ll wait a few more days for this
> thread to circulate and settle. At that point, if nobody objects, I’d be
> ready and comfortable to move forward with lazy consensus.
>
> First, voting on the Solid WG handover. Second, voting on my editing. Then
> the part that I am actually interested in starts - editing the consensus
> report itself! I’m looking forward to that.
>
> Some of you believe all this to be too much formality. To those I say, I
> appreciate your indulging me even more. Believe it or not, I’m ordinarily
> not one for formalities myself. However, a little formality goes a long way
> in guaranteeing that an interested party will be able to understand the
> process behind any specific decision in 1 or 10 years from now.
>

+1 thank you!