Quoting Jacopo Scazzosi (2022-01-27 19:18:29) > > Could we come to a consensus that content negotiation is optional > > for current and future WebID work? > > I agree that it should remain optional, as per the current WebID > spec/draft: > > a) conneg tends to be incompatible with hosting of static resources > b) conneg comes with its own complexity, which should not be forced > upon adopters of the spec > > In practice, this entails that a client asking for a specific > serialization format might: > > - receive a response in the requested format > - receive a "406 Not Acceptable" response if the requested format is > not supported by the publisher but basic conneg is > - receive the response in a different format if the publisher does not > support conneg > > I'm happy with all three implications. Excellent put: I fully agree with all that Jacopo wrote above! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2022 18:24:39 UTC