- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:37:35 +0200
- To: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>, public-webid@w3.org
> On 10. Aug 2021, at 13:29, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org> wrote: > > Am 10.08.21 um 07:29 schrieb Henry Story: >>> On 10. Aug 2021, at 00:52, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org> wrote: >>> Am 09.08.21 um 18:32 schrieb Henry Story: >>>>> On 9. Aug 2021, at 17:34, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org> wrote: >>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 20:07 schrieb Melvin Carvalho: >>>>>> I'm hearing that you dont have time/resources to take WebID >>>>>> any further So, would you step down as chair of the the WebID >>>>>> community group at let others, perhaps a community effort, to >>>>>> modernize it >>>>> I strongly support that. Not leaving any comment on a proposal >>>>> like that is even more an argument to look for another chair >>>>> who can contribute more time for the group. >> Btw. what is the proposal that is being talked about? > > The proposal is that you step down as a chair. Ah so your problem was that I did not leave a comment on a proposal on a different mailing list to remove me as a chair? And that is a reason to step down? […] >> >> and that is why we opened a github repository to make just such changes. You can even leave issues there. > > It's not about what I want to change. It's about why should one > contribute to the WebID group if: > > - the chair has no time to fulfill the role as chair > - the chair claims there is nothing to do It is about what it makes sense to change. If you have no real change proposals then what is the fuss about? I added a link to David Booth’s suggestions here in a new issue https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/2 We have wide deployment of WebID in the Solid community. I have heard of a number of cosmetic issues people have with it. Henry Story https://co-operating.systems WhatsApp, Signal, Tel: +33 6 38 32 69 84 Twitter: @bblfish
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2021 12:43:25 UTC