- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:34:21 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok26MG2J82b8+pcQFUAVs_kE4ZNxrTu=_-Xb4Hx2YyiQVw@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, auto text. Sando = Sandro Hope it has been deleted, pursuant to the policy process outlined by w3, et.al. On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 at 12:31 am, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > I honestly had no idea about these issues. I've followed up locally with > other lawyers who I work with, they didn't understand either. > > Sando, in no small way, is a guru. It was upsetting corrapondence to > receive, which, subject to good faith, may have been responded to with an > explaination, IMHO. > > Legal ontology / data-rights ontology might be able to graph such > considerations, as to ensure the rule of law in all juristions plays a more > important role. > > That way perhaps such issues could result in the piece being hidden from > view to U.S. citizens, where issues apply. > > A bit like the fb timeline being selective, just different. > > Apologies again. Hope it's all not deleted, and some context inserted to > give reason for censorship undertaking, et.al. > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 at 12:24 am, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > >> On 08/06/2015 06:50 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote: >> > I'm Australian. Are you not allowed to read about knowledge in the >> > U.S.? >> > >> > I have no awareness of the fears embodied within the breach of best >> > practices, and certainly don't like that the first email from you to >> > me, being scornful. >> >> Hey Tim, I don't think there was any scorn intended. Sandro is, >> rightfully, trying to protect the various groups dealing in this space. >> If we were to have read the patent material that you had linked to, it >> could expose the hundreds of mailing list participants to treble >> damages[1]. There is a big difference in being sued for $5M USD and $15M >> USD. :) >> >> We absolutely should not read any patents or link to them in any of the >> standards-based work we're doing. It has nothing to do w/ what /you/ can >> do (your rights aren't being limited). It has to do with what you're >> exposing the rest of the group to (in the US). >> >> -- manu >> >> [1] >> http://www.iplawalert.com/2013/03/articles/patent/treble-damages-for-willful-patent-infringement-become-elusive/ >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice >> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/ >> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2015 14:35:09 UTC