- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:49:40 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53CD60C4.7010605@openlinksw.com>
On 7/21/14 2:09 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > On 21 July 2014 19:32, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org > <mailto:sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> > <snip> >> >> The point is that identity is separable, and so it has been >> separated. Otherwise it would be too big a piece of work for one WG. >> >> Your oblique mention of Tantek reminds me, I don't know if this > > group has ever talked about the solution he's currently > endorsing, IndieAuth: >> >> https://indieauth.com/ > > Nope, never heard about it before. > >> >> It's fascinatingly minimalist. > > Indeed. > > > IMO, a more developed version of WebID+PKI could be even better > because it > would be "phishfree", offering PKI-strength, not requiring any text > input and > enabling *user-provided* icons[1]. > > Such a solution is also independent on if people own domains or not. > > Anders > > [1] making it simple managing multiple IDs (if needed). Yep! We are getting closer now :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 18:50:00 UTC