- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:20:44 +1000
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
WebID = URI - v.simple. Then of course - WebID-TLS starts to include that uri into an AUTH solution. ATM - the "mind position" of WebID is arguably the certificate experience, and the uri moreover considered whether or not someone has a "foaf uri". For WebID to have a "mind position" of "w3c identity & verification solutions" (to verify, one needs auth I imagine) then it needs to be shifted. This should include the existing spec IMHO. Mind position = "what is the brand for cola?" So... Anders = WebPKI... ;) > On 22 Jul 2014, at 4:09 am, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 July 2014 19:32, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org <mailto:sandro@w3.org> wrote: > <snip> >> >> The point is that identity is separable, and so it has been separated. Otherwise it would be too big a piece of work for one WG. >> >> Your oblique mention of Tantek reminds me, I don't know if this > > group has ever talked about the solution he's currently endorsing, IndieAuth: >> >> https://indieauth.com/ > > Nope, never heard about it before. > >> >> It's fascinatingly minimalist. > > Indeed. > > > IMO, a more developed version of WebID+PKI could be even better because it > would be "phishfree", offering PKI-strength, not requiring any text input and > enabling *user-provided* icons[1]. How might this WebID+PKI system work? How is it ENTIRELY decentralised? How can it be used in a centralised / decentralised manner (ie: you loose you keys - too bad / no problem). I believe there is currently a service available? WebPKI I think it is? Where is the source? How do I install it on my system? (Or any 3rd party) Perhaps let me know if I'm wrong, but it assume controlling the auth server (inc. Sovereignty considerations) is an important variable? > > Such a solution is also independent on if people own domains or not. > > Anders > > [1] making it simple managing multiple IDs (if needed). > >
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 23:21:16 UTC