- From: Guido Witmond <guido@witmond.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 21:54:24 +0200
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- CC: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <52321BF0.8040108@witmond.nl>
Hi Everyone, I'm the Eccentric-dude that came up with the Eccentric-Authentication thing. As I'm not a member of public-webid@w3.org yet, please CC me, when you want to respond to me. :-) There might be some strong similarities between WebId-TLS and Ecca as there were several people suggesting that. Please correct me (cc) when I'm wrong. What I read about WebId is that it is meant to manage a web of trust between people that know each other, some way or the other. Perhaps there is a mechanism how a stranger can become part of a web of trust. (I haven't read that far into WebId yet). However, my Eccentric protocol is designed to let total strangers exchange public keys and communicate securely. For that I tie into DNSSEC/DANE and a Merkle-tree based log service. Preferable p2p-distributed. I'd love to learn of the similarities and differences. With regards, Guido Witmond. http://eccentric-authentication.org/ On 09/12/13 18:01, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > FYI: a couple of replies to this in the w3c webid community group (which > is doing something very similar) ... maybe an idea to join forces and > standardize?! :) > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Andrei Sambra* <andrei.sambra@gmail.com > <mailto:andrei.sambra@gmail.com>> > Date: 12 September 2013 16:54 > Subject: Re: Fwd: [SocialSwarm-D] Eccentric Authentication > To: public-webid@w3.org <mailto:public-webid@w3.org> > Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org <mailto:public-webid@w3.org>> > > > The concept of using an out-of-band channel to pass a secret during a > key exchange is not new. :) I even wrote a paper [1] about it, a few > years ago. > > Andrei > > [1] http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/74/53/53/PDF/takes.pdf >
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 14:47:34 UTC