- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:01:53 +1100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
On 04/04/2013, at 4:18 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > All, > > I think the HTTP "From:" header [1] is now truly archaic circa. 2013. If the range of this particular predicate was a URI it would really aid our quest for a RWW. It's in active use by spiders and robots. > Suggestion: > > As part of our RWW bootstrap effort, we could consider an "X-From:" header that basically takes a URI or Literal value. > > I think we can flesh this out across WebID and RWW via implementations before moving up to TAG and IETF. > > Mark: what do you think, anyway ? :-) If you want something that takes a link, we have a Link header. Whatever you do, don't prefix it with X-. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 23:02:31 UTC