Re: Domain of :key

On 1 Apr 2013, at 18:01, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 4/1/13 11:56 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>>> 
>>> Though I think we have consensus slightly in favour rdfs : Resource
>> 
>> It is clear that there is no consensus at present. I still don't have a clear use case for why you want what
>> you want.
>> 
>> Henry
> 
> There is consensus about the need for a relation that associates an rdfs:Resource (or owl:Thing) with a public key. What's clearly in dispute is the appropriate relation :-)

Put that way we are getting closer to something I can agree with. But the use case for the relation from owl:Thing to the public key needs to be developed. This use case will probably help work out what the name of the relation should be and what its meaning would need to be.

Henry

> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/